GST litigation has steadily increased in recent years as the tax department intensifies scrutiny on assessments, ITC claims, and return filings. Even a minor mismatch in GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B, an incorrect ITC claim, or a delay in tax payment can escalate into a formal demand—placing businesses directly within the scope of GST demand and recovery proceedings.
At the heart of these proceedings are Section 73 and Section 74 of the CGST Act, two powerful provisions that determine how the department treats cases of unpaid tax or wrongly claimed ITC. While Section 73 deals with issues without fraud or wilful misstatement, Section 74 handles cases where fraud, suppression, or intent to evade tax is alleged. The section invoked can drastically change the penalty exposure, the timeline for adjudication, and the overall risk profile for the taxpayer.
For companies, finance teams, and tax professionals, understanding how these sections work is not just a matter of compliance—it is essential for reducing litigation, responding effectively to departmental notices, and safeguarding working capital. A clear grasp of the process helps organisations avoid unnecessary disputes, prepare documentation proactively, and access the reliefs available at different stages of adjudication.
This guide breaks down why demand notices are issued, how the proceedings typically unfold, what the law provides at each stage, and how Section 73 ultimately differs from Section 74. The aim is to give you clarity, reduce uncertainty, and help you build stronger internal systems that prevent costly disputes before they arise.
Situations That Lead to GST Demand & Recovery Proceedings
A GST demand typically arises when the department identifies inconsistencies or non-compliance during scrutiny, audit, investigation, analytics, or automated system checks. Common situations include:
- Non-payment or short-payment of GST
- Tax discharged under an incorrect tax head
- ITC claimed on ineligible or mismatched invoices
- Excess refund or ITC sanctioned earlier
- Discrepancies detected between GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, and GSTR-2A/2B
- ITC reversal not done when vendor payments remain pending beyond 180 days
- Tax collected from customers but not remitted
- Non-declaration or suppression of outward supplies
- Use of non-genuine invoices or suspected fraudulent ITC claims
Once an issue is traced, the officer determines whether the lapse was unintentional or involved fraudulent conduct.
This classification decides whether proceedings are launched under Section 73 (non-fraud cases) or Section 74 (fraud or intentional evasion).
Understanding Section 73 & Section 74 of the CGST Act
Section 73 – Non-Fraud Situations
This provision addresses cases where tax is unpaid or short-paid without deliberate misrepresentation or intent to evade. Mistakes such as clerical errors, interpretation differences, or inadvertent omissions generally fall under this section.
Section 74 – Fraud or Wilful Misstatement
This section covers instances where non-payment or short-payment results from fraud, suppression of facts, intentional misstatement, or deliberate intent to evade tax.
Penalty implications and the time allowed to issue orders are more stringent under this section.
Detailed Comparison: Section 73 vs. Section 74
1. Nature & Intent
| Particulars | Section 73 (Non-Fraud) | Section 74 (Fraud) |
| Basis of proceeding | Unintentional mistakes | Intentional evasion or misrepresentation |
| Typical examples | Calculation errors, missed entries, procedural gaps | Fake invoices, manipulated turnover, fabricated ITC claims |
2. Penalty Structure
| Stage of Payment | Section 73 | Section 74 |
| Before SCN | No penalty | 15% of tax |
| Within 30 days of SCN | 10% of tax or ₹10,000 | 25% of tax |
| Within 30 days of adjudication order | 10% of tax or ₹10,000 | 50% of tax |
| After 30 days | Regular penalty under section | Mandatory 100% penalty |
3. Time Limit for Issuing Orders
| Section | Maximum Time Limit |
| 73 | Up to 3 years from the due date of the annual return |
| 74 | Up to 5 years from the due date of the annual return |
4. Voluntary Payment Before SCN (DRC-01A)
| Section | Benefit |
| 73 | Payment of tax + interest closes the proceeding |
| 74 | Payment of tax + interest + 15% penalty concludes the case |
5. Burden of Proof
| Section | Onus |
| 73 | Officer must show that the short-payment occurred without intent |
| 74 | Department must establish fraudulent intention, misstatement, or suppression |
How GST Demand & Recovery Proceedings Unfold
Step 1: Pre-Notice Intimation – DRC-01A
Before issuing a formal Show Cause Notice (SCN), the officer informs the taxpayer about the discrepancy.
At this stage, taxpayers may:
- Pay the tax and interest (Section 73)
- Pay tax, interest, and 15% penalty (Section 74)
- Submit explanations or objections
If the officer accepts the payment or explanation, the matter is closed through DRC-04.
Step 2: Issue of Show Cause Notice (SCN) – DRC-01
The SCN contains:
- The proposed tax demand
- Calculation of interest
- Applicable penalties
- Grounds for the demand
- Evidence or documents relied upon
Step 3: Filing of Reply – DRC-06
The taxpayer must submit a structured response supported by documents, reconciliations, legal references, or factual clarifications.
Step 4: Personal Hearing
A personal hearing is generally offered, allowing the taxpayer or authorised representative to:
- Present clarifications
- File supporting documents
- Argue legal positions
- Address issues raised in the SCN
Step 5: Final Adjudication Order – DRC-07
The officer issues a formal order specifying:
- Confirmed tax liability
- Interest payable
- Penalty imposed
- Payment deadlines
Step 6: Recovery Actions (If Dues Remain Unpaid)
If the taxpayer does not pay the confirmed demand, the department may invoke recovery provisions, including:
- Freezing bank accounts
- Attachment of movable/immovable property
- Blocking or attaching receivables
- Adjusting dues against refunds
- Auctioning assets
- Detention of goods during movement
Relief Options Available to Taxpayers
- Voluntary Payment Before SCN
Offers maximum relief and prevents litigation.
- Payment Within 30 Days of SCN
Significant penalty reduction under both sections.
- Payment Within 30 Days of Final Order (Section 74 Only)
Allows 50% reduction of the otherwise mandatory penalty.
- Appeal Under Section 107
Taxpayers may challenge the order by paying a pre-deposit of:
- 10% of disputed tax (Section 73 cases)
- 25% of disputed tax (Section 74 cases)
Measures to Prevent GST Demand Notices
- Reconcile GSTR-1, GSTR-3B, and GSTR-2B regularly
- Monitor vendor compliance and filing behaviour
- Claim ITC only when conditions under Section 16 are met
- Maintain accurate and complete documentation
- Ensure correct HSN/SAC classification
- Rectify mismatches promptly
- Conduct periodic internal GST audits
- Keep evidence of payments made under RCM
TL;DR – Key Takeaways
- Section 73 covers cases without fraudulent intent, with lower penalties and shorter timelines.
- Section 74 applies to intentional evasion or misstatement and imposes higher penalties and extended time limits.
- Proper documentation, timely reconciliations, and quick responses to departmental notices reduce the risk of disputes and potential tax exposure.
How PGACA Assists Businesses
PGA&CO (PGACA) supports businesses through:
- Comprehensive GST return review and reconciliations
- Assessment of ITC eligibility and vendor-side compliance
- Assistance in responding to departmental notices and preparing documentation
- Ensuring timely and accurate GST filings
Our objective is to help organisations build and maintain strong, reliable compliance systems while fully adhering to GST laws and industry-accepted best practices.